In collaboration with DC Parks and Recreation, GSDC has created a Park Partners List Serve so share information and collaborate of issues of interest. Sign up and join the conversation.
In March 2014 DC Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) released “Park + Recreation: Vision Framework” http://dpr.dc.gov/node/807532 . I urge you to take a look. It contains good ideas that can become a foundation for discussion and dialogue. Specifically, the plan recommendations are framed around seven (7) elements:
- Recreation Centers,
- Aquatic Facilities,
- Outdoor Facilities,
- Bikeways & Trails, and
- Environmental Lands & Natural Areas.
This draft plan revisits many of the ideas presented in the 2010 CapitalSpace Plan, which was a collaboration among DPR, District of Columbia Office of Planning, National Capital Planning Commission, and National Park Service, http://alturl.com/ksttw .
Immediately after the kickoff of the DPR master plan project in June 2013], http://playdc.org/ , I wrote an article voicing skepticism about DPRs commitment to public involvement. As it turns out, my apprehensions were justified. The only public meetings held were those to kick off the project last June 15th, 17th, 18th and 20th. It appears that most of the input for the new plan came from an invited steering committee of regional park and recreation experts. It is shameful that this expert panel did not identity public participation as an essential prerequisite for a sound plan.
It is also ironic that DPR would slight face-to-face public engagement, when the Park, Recreation and Open Space element of the DC Comprehensive plan mandates “…responsiveness to the preferences and needs of the neighborhoods around the parks.” See below:
•Action 1.2 B: Public Involvement — Consult with ANCs and local community groups on park planning and development to understand and better address resident priorities.
• Policy 2.1.4: Responding to Local Preferences – Provide amenities and facilities in District parks that are responsive to the preferences and needs of the neighborhoods around the parks. Park planning should recognize there are different leisure time interests in different parts of the city. To better understand these differences, the community must be involved in key planning and design decisions.
DPR’s draft 2006 Master Plan was blunt: “Based on interviews with staff and external stakeholders, DPR is not effectively communicating with internal staff and external stakeholders. Common complaints were a lack of consistent communication by DPR with the Area Neighborhood Clusters (ANC) and neighborhood stakeholders.”
Enough said about what was not done. The new “Vision Framework” provides an opportunity to redress past deficiencies. DPR should take the draft plan on the road to every ANC to solicit comment and engage the community in dialogue on how each of the different neighborhoods can benefit from enhanced parks and green spaces. As stated in the DC Comprehensive Plan, “To better understand these differences, the community must be involved in key planning and design decisions.” Finally, these meetings must be facilitated by neutral public participation professionals that understand how to build the capacity for community members to convey their needs and desires. Just as all neighborhoods have different needs, each has a different capacity to participate.
The District has never had a parks and recreation master plan. This first plan should be an exemplar of best practices. By committing to a robust public engagement process, the District of Columbia can take a bold step toward achieving that objective.
John Henderson, President, Green Spaces for DC
When: Thursday July 31, 2014
Time: 6:30 to 8:30 PM
Where: District Architecture Center
421 7th Street NW, Washington DC 20004
Through a D.C. Urban Forestry grant, funded by the U.S. Forest Service, Green Spaces for DC conducted a youth-led PhotoVoice project. The theme is “if trees could talk.” PhotoVoice engages participants using photography as a way to discuss the circumstances that the images represent as a means of personal, community, and social change.
Ten young adults and ten late elementary/middle school youth are participating in this eight-week project, managed by GSDC Director, Autumn Saxton-Ross. After being taught the basics of photography and how trees are important to our environment, the youth were given a digital camera for a week to take pictures around what they have learned. When they turned in the cameras, we reviewed the pictures with them and asked why they took each picture and how it relates to the theme. It’s a process of learning how pictures can help create change.
As part of the project, a variety of speakers interact with the youth. We’ve had an engineer speak on storm water management and conduct an experiment to help the youth understand how trees and green space play a part in managing storm water. A master garden has instructed them on how to conduct tree maintenance.
- To create an awareness of the importance of trees in an urban environment,
- Give youth in Wards 7 and 8 opportunities to engage with members their community and to voice their perspective, and
- To show the utility of PhotoVoice as a viable method to promote urban forestry.
Join us and the youth at an end-of-program exhibit of the photographs at the District Architecture Center. We are inviting elected officials, community leaders, and neighbors to meet the youth and engage with them. We want to have the youth share their understanding of the process of change and talk to them about the issues, how policies impact trees, and what changes are needed.
Read more about this project and the views of GSDC Project Manager, Autumn Saxton-Ross at http://actrees.org/news/media-center/actrees-news/actrees-interview-photovoice-project-fosters-youth-tree-stewards/
Please join us on July 31 to celebrate the youth accomplishments and support the work of GSDC. Donations are encouraged. http://greenspaces4dc.org/?page_id=168 .
A master plan is the fundamental planning tool for a parks and recreation department. The DC Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) has never had a master plan to guide its decisions, although the DC Comprehensive Plan refers to a 2006 master plan that has never been publicly available. On June 11, 2013, the Department in partnership with the Office of Planning launched an initiative to create a master plan. According to the press release, “The Parks and Recreation Master Plan project team is interested in hearing residents’ ideas on the District’s overall parks system, including what is working well, areas that could use improvement, and large-scale ideas to be considered for implementation over the next ten years.”
The June 11 press release included one-week notification for the “first 3” public workshops on June 17th (Deanwood Recreation Center, 18th Judiciary Square and 20th Raymond Recreation Center. Really? Professional planners know that attendance at public meetings in the summer (i.e. Between Memorial Day and Labor Day) is not ideal and should be avoided. Also, if you are serious about public engagement, notice needs to be well-publicized at least two weeks in advance with plenty of constituent outreach. A notice of less than one-week is a patently inadequate. With this feeble start, the Office of Planning and DPR have conveyed the message that they are not interested in genuine participatory planning.
If disdain for public input wasn’t clear from the handling of the public meetings, it was from the announcement of the master plan kickoff. Once again short notice was given. The kickoff event was held on the same day and time that DPR was holding its first “Park Partners Summit.” If there is any group that should curry favor in the master planning process, it would be those organizations that have become officially designated DC park partners. Why disrespect Park Partners by forcing them to choose between the first-ever partners’ summit and the master plan kickoff?
The rationale for planning the initial three public meetings is not clear. Why was there such short notice; why only three meetings; why locate the meetings in Deanwood, Petworth and Judiciary Square; and why were these first meetings so lacking in substance?
I attended the first public meeting at the Deanwood Recreation Center, which was attended by approximately 20 residents. When questions about the short notice were asked, some in the room indicated they were given advance notice, while the meeting facilitator countered by stating that public meetings were one of several public participation tools, including a statistically valid survey and an on-line survey tool called Mind Mixer. Attendees were given business cards with a web address and encouraged to participate online. http://playdc.org/ Mind Mixer does not yet have a following; none of the 19 “Great Ideas” posted apparently by the same person received more than 21 votes.
Office of Planning Director Harriet Tregoning and Parks and Recreation Director Jesús Aguirre provided generalized overviews about city growth and the changing needs for parks and recreation. There were allusions to the challenge of doing a master plan when DPR manages only 12 percent of DC parkland—even maintenance of that 12 percent is now outsourced to the Department of General Services. Mention was also made of the recent park scorecard issued by the Trust for Public Land showing DC as one of the overall best-served jurisdictions in the nation on a per capita basis, while suffering from an inequitable distribution of large useable parks. http://parkscore.tpl.org/city.php?city=Washington
The project consultants have done a condition assessment of 67 of 325 DPR sites and facilities. They indicate that there is no intent to complete the survey because of inadequate resources. Furthermore, the scope of the master plan is ill-defined. The PlayDC website states that the master plan will be “comprehensive,” but does not say how. Will this be an update of the CapitalSpace Plan www.ncpc.gov/capitalspace which looks at all parks and green space in DC, including what is managed by National Park Service and DCDOT or, is this just a comprehensive look at parks and programs under the purview of DPR?
The parks, recreation and open space element of the DC Comprehensive Plan indicates that the 2006 master planning provides a detailed assessment of recreational needs in each of the District’s 39 neighborhood clusters. DPR should post the 2006 plan, and make available the planning maps for the 39 clusters. Each neighborhood can then make recommendations on how to review and update its plan.
For the master plan to be truly comprehensive the following steps must be accomplished:
- Post the 2006 Park and Recreation Master Plan including the plans for the 39 neighborhood clusters
- Map of all parks and green space in every neighborhood, regardless of management jurisdiction
- Assess the condition of all parks and recreation facilities, both DPR and NPS
- Substantively engage the public in each of the 39 neighborhoods to ascertain current needs and desires for parks and recreation facilities.
John Henderson, President
Green Spaces for DC
June 23, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 13, 2013
Norton Calls on NPS to Ban Smoking in D.C. NPS Parks
WASHINGTON, DC – Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) today wrote to National Park Service (NPS) Regional Director Steve Whitesell asking NPS to further its efforts to preserve and enhance parks by banning smoking in all NPS units, including parks, sites and trails, in the District of Columbia. Norton cited United States Department of Interior Director Order #50D that provides superintendents with the authority to ban smoking in NPS units. “Many find smoking in parks to be incompatible with enjoying the fresh air and recreation afforded by our many parks here,” said Norton. “In a city with high rates of bronchitis and asthma, the parks ought to be a refuge from smoking.” D.C. residents have been working with the D.C. Council on a bill, which is currently pending before the Council, to ban smoking in the city’s parks that are within 25 feet of a playground. However, NPS action is necessary because the majority of parks in the District are owned by NPS and a smoking ban in D.C. parks would have little effect in the District. The full text of Norton’s letter follows.
June 13, 2013
Dear Regional Director Whitesell:
Thank you for your continuing and important work to preserve and enhance our parks in the National Capital Region. I write today to ask you to further this effort by banning smoking in all National Park Service (NPS) units in the District of Columbia. This issue was brought to my attention by several constituents who have expressed concerns about smoking in NPS parks in D.C. I agree with their concern that residents and visitors should be able to enjoy our parks free of health risks, including second-hand smoke, which contributes to asthma, bronchitis, cancer and other severe health conditions. One should not go to an NPS park to enjoy the outdoors and find smoke instead of fresh air. Freedom from second-hand smoke in the outdoors is particularly important in big cities like D.C., where pollution and traffic congestion already contribute to health conditions similar to those caused by second-hand smoke. My constituents have been working with the District of Colombia Council on a bill to ban smoking in the city’s parks that are within 25 feet of a playground, and a bill to do so is currently pending before the Council (Bill 20-93, the Prohibition of Smoking Near Playground Act of 2013). As you know, however, the majority of parks in my District are owned by NPS, and thus a smoking ban in D.C. parks would have limited effect here. We have learned from NPS staff that NPS has the authority to implement the smoking ban we are requesting. Under U.S. Department of the Interior Director Order #50D, NPS superintendents have the authority to ban smoking in NPS parks to protect the public from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure, or second-hand smoke. The official order provides that “a site manager may, at any time, close an area or facility to smoking when necessary to (a) protect park resources, (2) reduce the risk of fire, (3) protect employees and the public from ETS exposure, or (d) prevent conflicts among visitor use activities.” The order also explains the harmful effects of second-hand smoke and notes the general NPS policy to “provide smoke-free environment[s].” Implementing this policy in our parks here is particularly important at a time when the D.C. population is growing by over 1,000 residents per month and when many of these residents are young parents with children. The well documented health risks associated with second-hand smoke converge with D.C.’s unfortunate number of smoking-related health risks and deaths. Our city has long benefited from our many NPS parks, and my constituents reap the benefits of the nature that NPS parks provide. I ask that you ban smoking in all NPS park units in D.C. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I ask for an early response.
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Council Members Evans and Orange have introduced legislation to ban smoking within 25 feet of a playground. CM Cheh will hold a hearing on Monday May 13 at 11:00. See public hearing notice with links to the legislation below. We believe the more effective approach would be to ban smoking in all parks– both those managed by DC government and those managed by the National Park Service. A simple uniform prohibition on smoking in all DC parks will require minimal enforcement becasue it will be self-policed by District residents.
Bill 20-93, the Prohibition of Smoking Near Playground Act of 2013, would prohibit smoking within 25 feet of any playground. Bill 20-95, the Smoking Restriction Amendment Act of 2013, would also prohibit smoking within 25 feet of a playground and would also require property owners to post four signs stating that this prohibition.
See our petition to register your support for a uniform total ban on smoking in DC parks:
Green Spaces for DC is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that uses civic engagement, education, and partnerships to ensure that Washington has an inspiring park and green space system that stimulates social, economic, environmental and physical health and fosters cherished experiences for all citizens.